FORMATION OF THE MODERN MUSICAL ELITE AS A LANDMARK OF PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC MUSIC EDUCATION
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

фахова академічна музична освіта, сучасна музична еліта, сучасне соціокультурне середовище, плюралізм еліт, музичний капітал, критичне мислення, культурна всеїдність. professional academic music education, modern musical elite, modern socio-cultural environment, pluralism of elites, musical capital, critical thinking, cultural omnivorism.

How to Cite

ДОЛГІХ, Я. В. (2022). FORMATION OF THE MODERN MUSICAL ELITE AS A LANDMARK OF PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC MUSIC EDUCATION. ACADEMIC STUDIES. SERIES “PEDAGOGY”, (1), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.52726/as.pedagogy/2022.1.16

Abstract

The article offers an analysis of the modern musical elite characteristics in the context of determining the guidelines for the professional academic music education. This stratum is positioned as a group of leaders capable of transformational activities dictated by crisis processes in the European music of the written tradition. This stratum is positioned as a group of leaders capable of transformational activities, dictated by the crisis processes in the European music of the written tradition. The problem of developing a new educational paradigm of the elite forming as a community ready to respond to modern challenges and transform musical culture is actualized. Emphasis is placed on the obsolescence of the traditional approach to the identification of the elite of academic music, based on the opposition of the «chosen» and «mass» groups. The peculiarities of the elite are related to the socio-cultural context, which is characterized by chaotic intonation diversity (Yu. Chekan), which gives rise to pluralism of musical elites. It is noted that the coexistence of a large number of equal subcultures eliminates the opus-centric concept of musical elite identification. Therefore, the definition of its identifiers should be based on the properties of academic musical practice. The qualitative characteristics of the modern musical elite, related to leadership in professional activities, intellectual activity, the aspect of musical interests are outlined. It is noted that professional competence is determined by the amount of accumulation of musical and cultural capital (P. Bourdieu) as a set of incorporating (knowledge, skills and experience), objectified (material objects) and institutionalized resources (academic recognition of the individual as a carrier of incorporated resources). Given the key role of intelligence in change processes, critical thinking is emphasized as a characteristic of the elite. The ability to think critically is understood as a prerequisite for the adaptation of academic music to modern conditions. The parameter of cultural omnivorism is positioned as the third dimension of identification of the modern musical elite, which indicates the ability to equally perceive and analyze all musical practices.

https://doi.org/10.52726/as.pedagogy/2022.1.16
PDF (Українська)

References

Адорно Т. В. Избранное: Социология музыки. Москва, Санкт-Петербург : Университетская книга, 1998. 445 с.

Бурдье П. Формы капитала. Западная экономическая социология: Хрестоматия современной классики. Москва : Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2004. С. 519–536.

Кожевникова Л. В. Трансформация роли элит в условиях глобализации. Вестник ГУУ. 2013. № 16. С. 303–305.

Кондаков И. В. Элитарная культура. Культурология. XX век. Энциклопедия в двух томах. Санкт-Петербург : Университетская книга, 1998. Т. 2. С. 385–389.

Лозовой В. А., Пугина И. Н. Культура личности. Интеллект. Творчество. Интеллектуализация общества и творчество. Новосибирск, 1991. С. 91–101.

Манхейм К. Избранное: Диагноз нашего времени. Москва : Изд-во «РАО Говорящая книга», 2010. 744 с.

Мартынов В. Конец времени композиторов. Москва : Русский путь, 2002. 296 с.

Михайлева Е. Г. Интеллектуальна элита в матрице современных цивилизационных изменений. Харьков : Изд-во НУА, 2007. 576 с.

Олейник М. А. Музыка как фактор социокультурной стратификации в современном обществе. Известия ВГПУ. 2007. № 3. С. 95–98.

Флиер А. Я. Культурология для культурологов. Москва : Академический Проект, 2000. 496 с.

Чекан Ю. Інтонаційний образ світу. Київ : Логос, 2009. 226 с.

Чекан Ю. Сучасна соціокультурна ситуація і проблеми музичної освіти. Українська музика. 2013. Число 3. С. 41–53.

Bourdieu P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1984. 613 p.

Emmison M. Social class and cultural mobility: Reconfiguring the cultural omnivore thesis. Journal of Sociology. № 39 (3). 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048690030393001

Huitt W. Critical thinking: An overview. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA : Valdosta State University, 1998. URL: http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/critthnk.html (дата звернення: 28.01.2022).

Veenstra G. Class Position and Musical Tastes: A Sing-Off between the Cultural Omnivorism and Bourdieusian Homology Framework. Canadian Review of Sociology. № 5. 2015. P. 134–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12068