COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES OF FREEDOM AND JUSTICE: FROM HUMANISM TO POSTHUMANISM
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

комунікаційні стратегії, свобода, справедливість, гуманізм, постгуманізм, людина communication strategies, freedom, justice, humanism, posthumanism, human

How to Cite

DOBRODUM О. В. (2025). COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES OF FREEDOM AND JUSTICE: FROM HUMANISM TO POSTHUMANISM. ACADEMIC STUDIES. SERIES “HUMANITIES”, (4), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.52726/as.humanities/2025.4.14

Abstract

The article examines the communication strategies through which the concepts of freedom and justice are constructed and realized during the transitional period from the humanistic to the posthumanistic paradigm. Communication functions not as a neutral channel for transmitting meanings, but as an active field of normative construction: the architectures of communication systems, algorithmic rules, and platform practices shape the conditions of visibility, legitimation, and contestation within which freedom and justice acquire their concrete content. In humanistic discourse, freedom was traditionally understood as the autonomy of the rational subject, and justice as the outcome of procedural equality in dialogue among equals; communication in this context operated as a space of argumentation and mutual recognition. Contemporary digital transformation dismantles these premises: mass platforms, content personalization, and automated moderation practices make visibility and access to audiences the key resources of freedom, while justice becomes a question of transparency and accountability of technical and institutional mechanisms. The posthumanist perspective shifts the focus from individual subjectivity to distributed, hybrid subjectivity in which human and non-human agents (algorithms, bots, interfaces) jointly shape communicative practices. In such conditions, freedom is defined not only by the right to speak but also by algorithmic visibility, speed of dissemination, and persistence of presence in the information field; justice requires procedures that guarantee equal access to distribution channels, the right to explanation of algorithmic decisions, and mechanisms for collective revision of rules. In conclusion, it is emphasized that the reconstruction of freedom and justice in the posthumanist era is possible only by recognizing communication as an active constructor of social and normative order and by developing policies that ensure accountability, inclusivity, and collective participation in shaping the rules of networked interaction.

https://doi.org/10.52726/as.humanities/2025.4.14
PDF (Українська)

References

Arendt, H. The human condition. University of Chicago Press. 1958.

Barad, K. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128

Berlin, I. Two concepts of liberty. In I. Berlin, Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford University Press. 1969.

Braidotti, R. Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press. 2019.

Costanza-Chock, S. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press. 2020. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. 2019.

Ferrando, F. Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350059511

Floridi, L. The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press. 2014.

Foucault, M. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books. 1978.

Habermas, J. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press. 1989.

Haraway, D. J. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780

Hayles, N. K. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press. 1999.

Jasanoff, S. The ethics of invention: Technology and the human future. W. W. Norton. 2016.

Kant, I. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785). 1998.

Latour, B. Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. Polity Press. 2018.

Lyotard, J.-F. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. University of Minnesota Press. 1979.

Puig de la Bellacasa, M. Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816696260.001.0001

Rawls, J. A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. 1971.

Searle, J. R. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. 1969.

Stiegler, B. The neganthropocene. Open Humanities Press. 2018.

Taylor, C. A secular age. Harvard University Press. 2007.

Wolfe, C. What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press. 2010.

Zuboff, S. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs. 2019.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.